Skip to main content
  • Home
  • News and Articles
  • About
  • Resources
  • Learning and Discussion
  • Courses and Events
    • International Purchase
  • Speaking
  • Contact

This is Important and Interesting...

January 5, 2025 at 1:40 pm, 1 comment

      I think by now you can see how AI has progressed to the point where it can be relied upon to give sensible advice, even if it lacks the terrain knowledge of specific courts, judges, or political environments. It allows us to minutely examine the compliance of officialdom to due process, without getting bogged down in matters that they themselves refuse to engage in — such as morality, equity, or constitutionality. 

Martin Geddes, Substack: Future of Communications, 27th December 2024
    


Martin Geddes clarifies some of my recent thoughts about AI potentially being a disaster for the powers-that-shouldn't-be because of its innate ability in reason and logic... and therefore truth!

https://substack.com/home/post/p-153673984




1 comment - This is Important and Interesting...

ian - July 2, 2025 at 2:14 am
one must be careful not to place too much trust in AI.
in a recent exchange with an AI, i asked it what the functions and mechanisms of a birth certificate was.
as expected, it responded by stating that a birth certificate is an official document of identification.
when i notified it of the statement on the birth certificate being 'not to be used for identification purposes', it acknowledged this to be true, then amended its statement to being one of 'most people believe'.
a week later i revisited the AI and asked it the same initial question, its answer was the same as the initial response given the week before, being 'an official document for identification.
i corrected it once again.
when pressed further, it stated it had no memory of previous conversations, and can not learn from conversations.
it also admitted that it did not have intelligence per se, that it lacked human emotional intelligence amongst other things.
be warned, AI is not any kind of saviour.
i recently read about a solicitor using AI to formulate his legal argument, when presented to the court, it was revealed that the judge and case quoted therein was a fictitious judge and case garnered from a novel.
be wary.

Leave a reply







Recent Posts

  • Next Group Meeting Details Published: Local and Online
    3 Jul, 2025
  • New Meeting Groups for LawAndAlchemy & CommonLawConstitution
    24 May, 2025
  • Natural Law: Remedy or Ruin, It's Our Choice
    2 Apr, 2025
  • Natural Law: Remedy or Ruin, It's Our Choice
    1 Apr, 2025
  • Join Me on Ben Rubin's 'Pattern Weekly' Discussion
    26 Mar, 2025
  • Ken Bartle - Excellent Discussion with Mike Adams
    21 Mar, 2025
  • Persuading the Constitutionalists to Learn About Natural Law
    19 Mar, 2025

Cart

Cart is empty.

Log in




Forgot password?
Create account
Login to existing account
My orders
My reviews
My details
Log out
Created with Mozello - the world's easiest to use website builder.